Rating calculations

Here's an explanation of how our rating system works.

The rating scale goes from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).

Person rating questionnaire

Do you think you would do his/her job better?: Do you think you would do his/her job better?

• [ 5 ]  No, he/she is a proven expert
• [ 4 ]  No, but I could try
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Most likely with the adequate training
• [ 1 ]  Yes, when can I start?

Would you support this person if he/she ran for a political position?: Would you support this person if he/she ran for a political position?

• [ 5 ]  Yes, with a generous donation
• [ 4 ]  Most likely
• [ 3 ]  I don't think so
• [ 2 ]  Never
• [ 1 ]  I will always support his opponent no matter who that is

Do you think that the work of this person is useful for the community?: Rate if work done by this person is useful for the community?

• [ 5 ]  Very useful
• [ 4 ]  I am not sure
• [ 3 ]  Not useful
• [ 2 ]  Useless
• [ 1 ]  Contra-productive

Rate the ability of this person to deliver results.: Ability of this person to deliver results

• [ 5 ]  Always gives the best/most efficient results
• [ 4 ]  There are results, but not always in time/efficient
• [ 3 ]  I am not familiar with his/her work
• [ 2 ]  There are some results
• [ 1 ]  No results

Do you think this is the right person for the position?: Do you think this is the right person for the job?

• [ 5 ]  Yes, it would be hard to find someone better
• [ 4 ]  Yes
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  No, he/she should be replaced
• [ 1 ]  No, even a monkey would do it better

Can the public trust this person?: Can the public trust this person?

• [ 5 ]  Always
• [ 4 ]  Sometimes
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Rarely
• [ 1 ]  Never

---

Charity rating questionnaire

What do you think about compensations and benefits working for this organization?: Rate the salaries in this organization

• [ 5 ]  High salaries and excellent benefits
• [ 4 ]  Just about right
• [ 3 ]  I am not familiar with their compensations
• [ 2 ]  It could be better
• [ 1 ]  Employees are underpaid

How hard is to donate founds to this charity?: Rate how accessible are different methods of donation (Internet, phone, mailing checks...).

• [ 5 ]  They accept all methods and types of currency
• [ 4 ]  Easy to donate
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Not easy
• [ 1 ]  Very hard

Would you work or volunteer for them?: Would you work or volunteer for them?

• [ 5 ]  Yes, it would be an honour
• [ 4 ]  Yes
• [ 3 ]  Maybe
• [ 2 ]  Not likely
• [ 1 ]  Definitely not

Do you trust/support this charitable organization?: How much do you trust to this organization?

• [ 5 ]  Always have my full support
• [ 4 ]  From time to time
• [ 3 ]  I don't have an opinion
• [ 2 ]  Rarely
• [ 1 ]  Never

How would you rate their employees and volunteers?: Rate charity personal.

• [ 5 ]  Excellent
• [ 4 ]  Good
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Irresponsible
• [ 1 ]  Incompetent, lazy and greedy

Rate abilities and competence of senior management?: Rate senior management.

• [ 5 ]  Great
• [ 4 ]  Good
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Irresponsible
• [ 1 ]  Incompetent, lazy and greedy

How would you describe usage of founds collected?: Describe how well funds are being used.

• [ 5 ]  I believe the founds are used wisely.
• [ 4 ]  Good
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Small percentage is hitting targeted purpuse
• [ 1 ]  Misuse of founds

Is this organization useful for the community?: Rate how useful the organization is.

• [ 5 ]  Yes, it is of vital interest and many people benefit from it
• [ 4 ]  Yes
• [ 3 ]  Not sure
• [ 2 ]  Not very useful
• [ 1 ]  No, it should be disbanded

What do you think about their vision, strategy and humanitarian work?: Rate vision and strategy.

• [ 5 ]  Excellent
• [ 4 ]  Good
• [ 3 ]  Average
• [ 2 ]  Bellow average
• [ 1 ]  I think there are serious issues with this organization

---

Rating scheme

We use the following scheme to convert the number scale into descriptive ratings: